|
August
25, 2003
Standing
Committee responds to church debate on Proposal 84
The Uniting
Church's Assembly Standing Committee (ASC) met over the past weekend
to consider issues arising from the 10th Assembly in Melbourne in
July.
At the meeting
the ASC received petitions from church members and 'attendees' concerning
resolution 84. In response (full text below) to widespread debate
within the church, of which the petition was a part, the ASC:
§ Apologised
to members and ministers that more was not done to make them aware
in advance of the Tenth Assembly that matters of membership, ministry
and sexuality would be considered by the Assembly;
§ Acknowledged with regret that the way proposal 84 was reported
to the church had caused suffering, hurt, pain confusion;
§ Clarified proposal 84 by deleting two paragraphs from the
original proposal which referred to two sexual ethics held by members
in the church ('Celibacy in singleness and faithfulness in marriage'
and 'Right relationships'). ASC said these were used to illustrate
some differing views held by church members and neither of them
has ever been endorsed by Assembly;
§ Rejected assertions that the concept of 'Right relationships'
was adopted by the Assembly;
§ Maintained
that each presbytery has the right and responsibility to ordain
or place people in ministry on a case by case basis - as has always
been the case in the Uniting Church;
§ Said
each congregation and church council can state a particular sexual
ethic after prayerful consideration and study of the Scriptures
- provided there is respect and acknowledgment for those who hold
different views and DOES NOT prevent consideration of candidates
for ministry on a case by case basis;
§ Declined
to recall Assembly, as the Assembly did not endorse or approve 'Right
relationships' and therefore did not introduce "new policy
for the church"; (see clarification above)
§ Reminded
the church it has already agreed to important matters in the areas
of marriage, divorce, re-marriage, sexual ethics and that the church
has adopted a Code of Ethics and Ministry Practice giving clear
guidance for appropriate conduct and accountability for ministers.
The President
of the Uniting Church, Rev Dr Dean Drayton said, "The ASC has
heard and apologised for the hurt and confusion from people because
adequate notice was not given that the Assembly would be considering
sexuality issues.
"We have
worked hard to clarify the resolution passed by the Assembly by
deleting references to 'Celibacy in singleness and faithfulness
in marriage' and 'Right relationships'. Assembly has never endorsed
either position.
" The ASC
gave an extensive hearing to the members of our church on this matter,
and ask them to carefully consider our response.
"This kind
of respectful listening to each other is vital as we continue on
together."
ASC DECISIONS
ON MEMBERSHIP, MINISTRY AND SEXUALITY
(in light of concerns expressed on Assembly proposal 84)
The Assembly Standing Committee joyfully acknowledges that:
"The Church as the fellowship of the Holy Spirit confesses
Jesus as Lord over its own life; it also confesses that Jesus is
Head over all things, the beginning of a new creation, of a new
humanity." (Basis of Union, para 3)
We further gratefully
acknowledge that:
"in his own strange way Christ constitutes, rules and renews
[us] as his Church." (Basis of Union, para 4)
Having prayerfully
met in retreat from 22 to 24 August 2003, seeking God's will and
believing this to be God's guidance, we resolved that the Assembly
Standing Committee:
STATEMENT
OF APOLOGY AND REGRET
1. Acknowledges
with regret that proposal 84 and the way it was reported has evoked
depths of shared suffering among members of the Church, leading
to many members experiencing pain, hurt confusion and anger.
2. Apologises
to members and ministers that more was not done to make them aware
in advance of the Tenth Assembly that matters of membership, ministry
and sexuality would be considered by the Assembly.
CLARIFYING
PROPOSAL 84
3. (a) Notes
that "Celibacy in singleness and faithfulness in marriage"
and "Right relationships" referred to in parts 2(ii) and
(iii) of proposal 84 were intended to illustrate some differing
views held by church members and have never been endorsed or approved
by the Assembly or its Standing Committee.
(b) Celebrates
that in the Uniting Church we have already agreed on and affirmed
important matters regarding marriage, marriage preparation, marriage
counseling, divorce, re-marriage, sexuality and sexual ethics (Assembly
minutes 97.31.5-97.31.13) and we have adopted the Code of Ethics
and Ministry Practice which gives clear guidance about the appropriate
conduct and accountability of ministers.
4. In order
to clarify the meaning of proposal 84 in accordance with the rationale
presented to the Assembly, determines to act under its powers stated
in Constitution clause 47 and Regulation 3.6.26 to vary proposal
84 as attached.
5. Informs the
Church that congregations and councils of the Church who wish to
state a sexual ethic may elect to do so after prayerful consideration
and study of the Scriptures providing that
· there is respect for and acknowledgment of those who hold
a different view;
· such statements do not prevent the consideration on a case-by-case
basis of individuals related to candidature, ordination or commissioning,
and placement, according to proposal 84.3.
MINISTRY
AND MEMBERSHIP IN THE UNITING CHURCH
(Proposal 84 as varied by the Assembly Standing Committee, 24 August
2003)
"The Assembly
Standing Committee, acting with the powers of the Assembly, resolved:
1. To note the
following extracts from Assembly minute 00.25.03:
(a) we celebrate that the Church's faith is in the triune God, Father,
Son and Holy Spirit, and that the Church's work and unity are built
upon the person and work of the Lord Jesus Christ;
(b) we affirm the authority of the Scriptures as defined in the
Basis of Union, acknowledging that within the Church there is a
range of views on questions of Biblical interpretation on various
matters of Christian faith and practice;
(c) we affirm we are bound together by Christ, and because we love
the Uniting Church as part of the one holy catholic and apostolic
church we will continue to work together in our diversity as servants
of the living God.
2. Noting that:
(i) within the Church people of faith have wrestled with integrity
to interpret Scripture in relation to the issue of Christian sexual
ethics and have on some issues come to mutually exclusive positions;
(ii) membership of the Uniting Church is open to all persons subject
only to the guidance of the Basis of Union, the Constitution, the
Regulations and policies of the Assembly,
to call upon members of the Church to seek to live together in peace
as people of faith, notwithstanding differing views in the matter
of same gender relationships.
3. To remind
Presbyteries of the decisions of previous Assemblies that:
(a) in considering issues related to candidature, ordination or
commissioning for specified ministries, and the placement of persons
in specified ministries, decisions should only be taken on a case
by case basis; and
(b) a decision on the suitability of an applicant or candidate depends
upon a wide range of criteria and may include consideration of the
manner in which the applicant's or candidate's sexuality is expressed.
4. To request
the Standing Committee:
(a) to provide guidance for Congregations and Presbyteries on how
to conduct discussions on contentious issues in ways that comply
with the Church's policy on vilification and harassment;
(b) to seek advice for the Church on the legal implications of the
relevant legislation, eg anti discrimination legislation, anti vilification
legislation, etc; and advise councils of the Church of this advice;
and
(c) to amend, on the advice of the Legal Reference Committee, Regulation
2.7.16(l) to make more explicit the role of presbyteries in the
placement of people in specified ministries."
Notes of the
variations made by the Standing Committee to Proposal 84
· in part 1(a) the words "We celebrate" have been
added, in order to be fully consistent with the resolution of the
Ninth Assembly;
· in parts 1(b) and (c) the words "we affirm" have
been added, in order to be fully consistent with the resolution
of the Ninth Assembly;
· in part 2 line 1 "Recognising" has been replaced
by "Noting";
· in part 2 clauses (ii) and (iii) have been deleted;
· in part 2 part (iv) has been renumbered as part (ii);
· in part 2 last line "same sex" has been replaced
by "same gender";
· in part 3 line 1 the words "of the decisions of previous
Assemblies" have been added.
Terence Corkin,
Assembly General Secretary
24 August 2003
RESPONSE TO PETITION
The Standing
Committee resolved to:
1. (a) Receive
the petitions signed by approximately 24,000 members and "attendees"
and acknowledge with deep regret their "deep spiritual and
emotional dismay and concern";
(b) advise the
signatories of the petitions of Standing Committee's decisions in
relation to Proposal 84;
(c) strongly
reject assertions within the petitions and affirm that:
(i) the concept of "Right relationships" was neither adopted
nor recognised by the Assembly;
(ii) the Assembly has not placed the Uniting Church outside of the
One , Holy, Catholic and Apostolic Church;
(iii) the Assembly has acted faithfully in accordance with the Basis
of Union;
(iv) the leadership of the Assembly did not mislead the Assembly;
(v) those who adhere to resolution 84 have not separated themselves
from the Uniting Church.
2. Acknowledge
the request to recall the Assembly for the purpose of referring
proposal 84 for concurrence and engaging in a service of repentance.
The ASC declines to accede to this request, noting the following:
(i) the clarification offered by the ASC of Proposal 84, in particular
that the 10th Assembly did not endorse or approve "right relationships";
(ii) proposal 84 did not introduce new policy for the Church;
(iii) councils of the Church are free to discuss matters of ministry,
membership and sexuality and to bring proposals to other councils
of the Church as appropriate.
|